Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ella Kinsman's avatar

Yeeess, thank you for this incisive reflection on Yorke's "statement" (jeremiad an appropriate categorization of it). His rhetorical framing for me strongly echoed that of irritating reactionary centrist pundits, who proffer (ungrounded in reality) "enlightened" moral equivocations between what they see as far-left & far-right politics, and whose conclusions generally cede ground to far-right futurisms ("let's go back to some imagined past, when discussions were sensible and fundamental power dynamics were un-examined & -expressed!").

Another horrific & nauseating roundup, and as always, thank you for this work.

Expand full comment
Medina's avatar

What annoys me is how these people unwittingly prop up colonial narratives under the guise of moral clarity. They don't say anything profound. They just pepper in different words into the same colonial narrative framework to make it sound like they're thinking outside the box.

He calls into question the unquestioned Free Palestine slogan? Word vomit. A slogan is questioned but not the occupation? It obscures how empire and capitalism function. You can only believe & say it should be questioned if you don't believe Palestinians are being colonized, and denying colonization already means you dehumanize them b/c the colonized have always been cast as morally inferior, while the actual material violence of the colonizers is obscured. And the subtext within this performative morality is always the same - "But what about Hamas?"

I'll also add that it reveals how deep the racism is embedded in the collective western subconscious that it renders many incapable of seeing Palestinians as human beings who are colonized & who have a right to resist.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts